The human capacity for choice can be both a blessing and a curse. The capacity to choose is often times overlooked when it comes to understanding performance in the work place. In times of a labor shortage, managers tend to disregard individual accountability, especially with an employee who is extremely proficient in a technical sense but whose attitude and behaviour is toxic. Managers try to cure these employees by applying a host of techniques related to communication, behaviour-based expectations, training and retraining, rewards and recognitions. E. Lawrence Kersten calls all this activity the “motivational-educational-industrial or the ME-I” complex, where managers are “encouraged” that the ills of problem employees are curable. (See “Soul Assassins,” Fast Company, May 2005, page 85.)
On the contrary, our research has found that, at a certain point, enough is enough. Many problem employees who are poisonous to the cohesion of a department do not respond to motivation. If you try to challenge their status quo, they will erupt—especially when you decide to create a culture of accountability. The best tactic is to remove them from the work place or to pressure them into a choice: change or leave.
Don’t misunderstand this point – there is still a huge need for performance coaching and counseling to achieve optimal performance outcomes. Providing resources and training to people with the right attitude will help them learn and grow, allowing them to be highly productive.
We spend far too much time trying to coach the negative attitudes of problem employees than we do with those employees who want to improve their skills, who desire to contribute to the greater good of the organization, but who simply lack the requisite skill or knowledge to do so effectively.
CORPORATE HARMONY is grateful to Dr. Michael E. Frisina for his contributions to this entry.
